0015 — Published institution definitions and reporting navigation

• Status: accepted
• Date: 2026-09-18
• Authority: Codex 1 Article III; Codex 0 §11 (surfaces), §16 (reporting); Codex 6 RUBRIC; STD-Q
• Supersedes: nothing. Extends DECISIONS/0014.

Decision

1. 1Each public ecosystem institution publishes its own supplied definition — category, positioning, core question, principles, areas of work, doctrine, lifecycle, internal schools, internal products, and boundaries — from a single canonical source, src/lib/ecosystem/records.ts. No second dataset, no fallback array, no per-page copy.
2. 2KOINONIA is published as an independent public-benefit institution in a visually and verbally separate section, with explicit non-ownership, no-shareholder, and no-automatic-claim statements. OIKODOME and ANORTHOSIS are published as operating initiatives inside KOINONIA and never as companies.
3. 3Products and operating layers inside an institution (for example the APODEMOS layers) are published as products of that institution and never as separate companies.
4. 4Charter and Research wording no longer implies that Anabasis governs or owns independent institutions. The Charter is described as the foundation of Anabasis and the institutions it directly builds; shared engines are described as available across appropriate Anabasis systems and ecosystem integrations.
5. 5/annual-report is removed from primary navigation and the footer until a verified reporting period exists. The route remains reachable and continues to publish the reporting standard with an explicit not-yet-reportable status. No metric is invented, restored, or estimated.

Why

Multiple generations of public content had drifted. Independent institutions were readable as divisions, and a reporting surface with no verified record was promoted in navigation as if it held institutional history. Both are trust failures under Codex 1 Article III and STD-Q.

Result (to be written at review)

• Review date: 2027-03-18.
• Result: unwritten.