The Codices of Anabasis

How the Codices are organised, and the order of authority between them.

Authority rank
6
Version
v1.3
Adopted
unrecorded
Held by
Stewardship Office
System
SYS-10

Source · docs/codices/README.md

The Codices are the constitutional and architectural authority of Anabasis. They are plain markdown, version-controlled, and framework-independent so they outlive any technology choice made in service of them.

Authority order

When two sources conflict, the higher one wins.

  1. 1Codex 1 — Constitution. Mission and non-negotiables. Nothing overrides it.
  2. 2Codex 0 — Master Blueprint. The institutional specification and Registry. All structure derives from it.
  3. 3Codices 2–11. Domain doctrine: divisions, CapabilityOS, people and roles, data and APIs, experience, engineering, finance, governance, institutional review, and the institutional systems architecture.
  4. 4The Standards (../standards/). The building code: how everything is built, and how a reviewer verifies it was. A Standard never overrides a Codex; where they conflict the Codex governs and the Standard is amended.
  5. 5Decision records (DECISIONS/). Dated architectural decisions taken against the Codices and the Standards.
  6. 6The Charter (src/lib/charter.ts, published at /charter). The institution's public voice. Where the Charter and a Codex diverge in substance, the Codex governs and the Charter is amended to match.
  7. 7Implementation (src/). Code is the servant of doctrine, never its source.

The three layers, in one line each: the Constitution says what must endure, the Codices explain how the institution works, the Standards ensure everything is built consistently.

Rule of interpretation

When a request conflicts with a Codex, name the conflict and explain it. Do not silently redesign around it. Where a Codex is silent or ambiguous, choose the reading that best advances the mission, preserves long-term flexibility, and strengthens the institution — then record the choice as a decision record.

The Codices

CodexSubject
Codex 0 — the specification bookThe Master Blueprint, in twenty-two numbered chapters: the complete institutional specification. Start at the index.
Codex 0, Part IIThe Institutional Registry — every system, with a permanent ID, owner, data, governing Codex, dependents, and status
Codex 0, summary mapThe one-file overview retained for orientation. Where it and a chapter of the specification book diverge, the chapter governs.
Codex 1Constitution — mission, tests, non-negotiables
Codex 2The Five Divisions, Executive Office, Stewardship Office
Codex 3CapabilityOS — engines, agents, knowledge graph
Codex 4People, user types, permission model
Codex 5Shared data model and API boundaries
Codex 6Experience — design, writing, accessibility
Codex 6, rubric and templatesThe Institutional UX rubric and the surface, interaction, and review templates
Codex 7Engineering standards
Codex 8The Financial Doctrine — stewardship of capital: seven forms of capital, five revenue engines, the allocation path, treasury, endowment, capital network, Impact Ledger
Codex 9The Governance Doctrine — bodies, decision rights, succession, emergency powers, ethics review, conflict of interest, amendment
Codex 10The Institutional Critic — mandatory review of major proposals
Codex 11The Institutional Systems Architecture — the four pillars, the twelve permanent systems, the capability graph, memory, the lifecycle

Citing doctrine

Cite the specification book by chapter and clause — Codex 0 §07.4.2 — never by page or heading text. Clause numbers are permanent: a clause may be superseded or marked reserved, but it is never renumbered or reused.

Amendment

A Codex is amended by adding a decision record in DECISIONS/ that states the change, the reasoning, and what it supersedes — then editing the Codex text. Codex 1 additionally requires the Stewardship Office's assent (Codex 9).

Status

These documents are internal doctrine. A public reading surface may be published later; until then they are not customer-facing copy and must not be quoted as certification, compliance, or audit claims.